U.S. House Reps Confront FCC on Not Changing 23-Year-Old RF Exposure Limits for Current Wireless Tech Despite Research Proving Harm
19 September 2019 |By B.N. Frank | Activist Post |
The role of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is to protect the public by regulating the Telecom Industry. They are not a health or environmental agency and have a long history of kowtowing to the Telecom Industry at the public’s expense (see 1, 2, 3, 4). They have been forcing widespread 5G installation despite the telecom industry providing NO evidence that it is safe – and many credible sources saying it isn’t (see 1, 2, 3, 4).
Current federal RF safety limits for cell phones and all other wireless technologies were established before most people had or were exposed to cell phones or other wireless radiation emitting technology. They don’t apply to how most of the population uses or are exposed today. They don’t consider more recent research and risks from all sources of exposure (see 1, 2, 3, 4, 5). These limits need to be changed but the FCC refuses to change them.
Thanks to Rep. Tom Suozzi of New York and Rep. Peter DeFazio of Oregon for addressing all of this in writing. Thanks also to Citizens for 5G Awareness for posting their letter on their website:
Please contact your representatives to encourage them to sign the letter as well.
Activist Post reports regularly about exposure risks from all sources of Electromagnetic Radiation aka “Electrosmog”. For more information visit our archives and following websites:
- Wireless Information Network
- Americans for Responsible Technology
- 5GCrisis
- 5GExposed
- 5G Information
- The 5G Summit
- Center For Safer Wireless
- Center For Electrosmog Prevention
- ElectromagneticHealth
- Electromagnetic Radiation Safety
- EMF Safety Network
- Environmental Health Trust
- Generation Zapped
- Physicians for Safe Technology
- TelecomPowerGrab.org
- Whatis5G.Info
- Zero5G
Team Z5G Fact Clarification:
The truth is that the FCC has no exposure standards, only guidelines: those guidelines were based in multiple instances of fraud from the beginning, which was in 1991, i.e., 28 years ago, NOT 1996.
Furthermore, those guidelines never applied to WCFs – wireless communications facilities – as they’re called in the 1996 Telecom Act, to any infrastructure that irradiates 24-7, but rather only to 6-minute and 30-minute exposures for public and occupational conditions, respectively.
Thank you to LB for sharing this article with us at ZERO5G!